Inactive

Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition, for- “”- Lease U.S. General Services Administration GSA Region 7 Redacted - JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PROJECT NUMBE... Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition, for- “”- Lease U.S. General Services Administration GSA Region 7 Redacted - JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PROJECT NUMBER: 9TX3338 Agency Name: X Redacted X NATURE AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF ACTION BEING APPROVED. The General Services Administration currently leases a total square footages of the leased premise shall change from x ABOA of office space at lease number X Redacted X - The current lease extension. Approval is requested to negotiate a short term extension with the incumbent Lessor without full and open competition for continued occupancy at this leased location. The right to pursue a short term extension is detailed in GSAR 570.402: Extension for Leases. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED TO MEET THE AGENCY’S NEEDS (INCLUDING ESTIMATED VALUE). submitted via GSA PM for short term extension per email directive, for change from of office and related space. To satisfy the ICE on going mission requirements must be at this facility with secured parking. This requirement is for to commence on upon acceptance of LA to be on The estimated cost of this lease is $ xRSF for term, based on information quotes received in response CoStar report per rentable square feet per year for an annual cost .The delineated area is same delineated area, (DA) as original DA. IDENTIFICATION OF STATUTORY AUTHORITY PERMITTING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION. 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(1): Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. In accordance with FAR 6.302-1 and GSAR 570.402, it is determined that award to any other offeror would result in substantial duplication of costs to the Government that are not expected to be recovered through competition. DEMONSTRATION THAT THE PROPOSED CONTRACTOR’S UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS OR NATURE OF THE ACQUISITION REQUIRES THE USE OF THE AUTHORITY CITED. It is in the best interest of the Government to remain at the current location. Award to other than the current Lessor would require relocation of the entire requirement and would cause ICE to incur move and replication costs that would not be recovered through competition. Estimated relocation costs are estimated to be $x. Additionally, this allows the Government to make use of existing tenant improvements and BSAC improvements, avoiding replication estimated costs of $. The cost of relocating ICE using the low cost quote exceeds the cost of remaining at -. The total savings to the Government is estimated to be $.