Inactive

Amendment 01 to RFP 305748-N-KD dated 5/13/2020 ****************************************************************************** REMINDER TO OFFERORS— REVIEW THE COMPLETE SOLICITATION PACKAGE INCLUDING ... Amendment 01 to RFP 305748-N-KD dated 5/13/2020 ****************************************************************************** REMINDER TO OFFERORS— REVIEW THE COMPLETE SOLICITATION PACKAGE INCLUDING ALL ATTACHMENTS BEFORE YOU SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSAL. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN YOUR PROPOSAL PACKAGE: RFP Cover Pages 2, and 3 (Complete and submit with Price Proposal) FL-201 Reps, Certs & Acknowledgements (Answer ALL questions and be sure to list received amendments in section 10.) Separate Price Proposal PACKAGE (Reference Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria) Separate Technical Proposal PACKAGE (Reference Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria) PASS/FAIL – Financial Condition and Capability information (Reference Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (if applicable)(Reference Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria) Oracle Advanced Cloud Services Registration (Reference Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria) READ THE COMPLETE SOLICITATION PACKAGE AND RESPOND ACCORDINGLY. ****************************************************************************** Fermi Research Alliance, LLC (FRA) intends to acquire fabrication services for the following requirements: Niobium Cavity Material for 650 MHz LB 5-Cell Cavity Fabrication, in accordance with the attached specifications and drawings. The resultant subcontractor shall furnish all materials, personnel, facilities, support, and management necessary to meet these requirements. THIS IS A BEST VALUE SOURCE SELECTION. PROPOSAL EVALUATION FACTORS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN PRICE. Award will be made to that Offeror or Offerors whose proposal contains the combination of technical factors offering the overall best value to FRA. This will be determined by comparing differences in the value of technical and/or management features with differences in price. FRA is more concerned with obtaining superior technical or management features than with making an award at the lowest overall price. However, FRA will not make an award at a significantly higher overall price to achieve slightly superior technical or management features. The importance of price may increase as the difference in technical ratings decreases.