Inactive

19 January 2024: Awarded four (4) Indefinite Delivery Indefinity Quantity contracts: W9133L-24-D-6101, W9133L-24-D-6102, W9133L-6103, and W9133L-24-D-6104. See separate award notifications for details... 19 January 2024: Awarded four (4) Indefinite Delivery Indefinity Quantity contracts: W9133L-24-D-6101, W9133L-24-D-6102, W9133L-6103, and W9133L-24-D-6104. See separate award notifications for details. 22 June 2021: See attached W9133L-21-R-6000 - Fire Suppression Synopsis - Amendment No. 03, showing all changes in "track changes" and highlighted text - AND - Attached RFI Responses No. 32 - 38 16 June 2021: See attached W9133L-21-R-6000 - Fire Suppression Synopsis - Amendment No. 02, showing all changes in "track changes" and highlighted text. 16 June 2021: See attached RFI Responses No. 1 - 31. 11 June 2021: See attached W9133L-21-R-6000 - Fire Suppression Synopsis - Amendment No. 01, showing all changes in "track changes" and highlighted text. 26 May 2021: See attached RFI Responses No. 1 - 2. A-E IDIQ – beta.SAM SYNOPSIS Solicitation Number W9133L-21-R-6000 INDEFINITE DELIVERY TYPE ARCHITECT ENGINEER (A-E) CONTRACT FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU IN SUPPORT OF THE AIR AND ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FIRE SUPPRESSION CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND TERRITORIES CONTRACT INFORMATION: The National Guard Bureau is soliciting for Non-Personal Architect-Engineer (A-E) Services per Public Law 92-582 (Selection of A-E Statute) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 36. As a result of this announcement, the National Guard Bureau intends to award a target of four (4) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity IDIQ A-E contract awards solicited as Other than Small Business (i.e. unrestricted) in accordance with FAR 36.602. These contracts will provide Fire Suppression A-E services in support of Air National Guard (ANG) and Army National Guard (ARNG) mission requirements located across the 54 U.S. States and Territories. The total capacity of the four (4) contracts is $150M. This capacity will be shared among all firms. Each IDIQ will be for a five (5) year ordering period from the date of award of all contracts. No one firm will receive more than one award as a result of this solicitation. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this action is 541330. The Small Business size standard is $16.5M in average annual receipts of a business’s latest three fiscal years. Small businesses are encouraged to team with other businesses. These are not requirements contracts. The contract will consist of two (2) ordering periods; one (1) ordering period will be for five (5) years and one (1) optional ordering period for six months with a total contract ceiling of $150M for the entire program. The total contract period shall not exceed five (5) calendar years and an option to extend six (6) additional months. Task orders will be primarily for projects with a construction value typically between $75K and $40M, however, as required, larger and/or smaller projects may be executed. The minimum total fee guaranteed to each contract awardee is $2,500.00. Order limitations are as follows: The Contractor is not obligated to honor (1) any order for a single item above $4M or (2) any order for a combination of items over $6M. Work will be issued by negotiated firm-fixed price task orders. Projects to be designed are not yet determined and funds (except those reserved for the minimum fee guarantee) are not presently available. The selection of A-E firms is based on professional qualifications necessary for the performance of the required services (rather than competitive bidding procedures). All A-E firms are cautioned to review the restrictions of FAR 9.5 Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest and FAR 36.209 Construction Contracts with Architect-Engineer Firms. Any A-E firm that prepares a Design-Build Request for Proposal for a particular project will be restricted from participating in any contract or task order for the Design-Build of that particular project. All interested Architect-Engineers are reminded that, under the provisions of PL 95-507, they will be expected to place subcontracts to the maximum practicable extent consistent with the efficient performance of the contract with small and small disadvantaged firms. Large business firms that intend to pursue an IDIQ contract must convey their intent to meet the minimum small business goals on the SF330, Section C, by identifying subcontracting opportunities with small businesses. Minimum goals for this procurement are: Small Business (all types of small business combined) 14%; Small Disadvantaged Businesses 3%; Woman Owned Small Business 5%; HUBZone Small Business 1%; Veteran-Owned Small Business 2% and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business 2%. If selected as the most highly qualified firm, the large business offeror will be required to submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan following FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 219.704/705 as a part of the Request for Proposal Package. The subcontracting plan is NOT required with the SF330 submittal. The wages and benefits of service employees (FAR 22.10) performing under this contract must be at least equal to those determined by the Department of Labor under the Service Contract Act. This is a multiple award effort with the most-highly qualified firm receiving their RFPP first. Once that process is complete, the next most highly qualified firm will be provided their RFPP, and so on. In accordance with 40 USC 11, Selection of Architect and Engineers, the negotiation process will continue until an agreement is reached and all contracts are awarded. PROJECT INFORMATION: Anticipated A-E services for this NATIONAL contract may include but are not be limited to the performance of fire protection program support; A-E investigative and design services including development of construction documents; construction support; engineering studies; investigations and surveys in support of the Air and Army National Guard fire protection requirements. Typical work may include, but is not specifically limited to: A: the preparation of plans, specifications, calculations, and cost estimates; B: the development of cost management, quality control and quality assurance plans; C: construction inspection, testing and management services; D: development of engineering standards; E: preparations for design submissions; F: technical, economic, planning, value engineering and other studies, analyses, surveys, investigations, and reports; G: development of performance criteria for bridging documents for design build projects; H: development of documents to support government fire protection, detection and suppression construction and repair programs. Services may also include, but are not limited to, a wide variety of professional fire protection engineering services along with the necessary supporting constituent disciplines to install new or repair existing fire suppression, detection and protection systems to meet the needs of the National Guard. Various projects may include services associated with National Guard hangar foam fire suppression, facility fire suppression and fire alarm systems and emergency communication center reporting for the following type of facilities: aircraft hangars, corrosion control facilities, aircraft maintenance facilities, Service Compartmented Information Facilities (SCIF), vehicle maintenance facilities, support equipment maintenance facilities, administrative offices, supply facilities, civil engineering facilities, dormitory buildings, training site facilities, readiness centers (armory), fire stations, security forces facilities, munitions maintenance and storage facilities, communications and electronic maintenance, mobility and aerial port facilities, dining facilities, medical training facilities, site utilities, infrastructure, and other various support facilities. Additionally, task orders may be issued for support services which require A-E Services as defined in FAR 2.101. SELECTION CRITERIA: The selection criteria are listed below in descending order of importance (first by major criterion and then by each sub-criterion). Criteria A – Professional Qualifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services (SF330, Part I, Section E): The selected firm must have, either in?house or through consultants, all disciplines listed for this criteria and must provide resumes in Part I, Section E, of the SF330. Resumes shall not exceed two (2) pages each. All engineers, architects and the project manager must have the following in the role that they are assigned to on the project team; a Bachelor’s degree, professional registration, and at least five (5) years of relevant experience. The Government may give additional consideration for special training or certifications, additional registration, higher level of education degrees, and/or years of experience that exceeds the five (5) year minimum requirement: (1) Fire Protection Engineer (FPE) – must have an ABET accredited engineering degree and current registration in the field of Fire Protection Engineering within the United States or its territories, having passed the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveyors (NCEES), and at least five (5) years of relevant experience; (2) Mechanical Engineer; (3) Electrical Engineer; (4) Structural Engineer; (5) Project Manager (6) Civil Engineer; (7) Communications Specialist (Registered Communications Distribution Design (RCDD)); (8) Corrosion Engineer (Registered National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) Certified Corrosion Specialist, NACE Certified Cathodic Protection Specialist, or registered professional corrosion engineer) with a minimum of five (5) years’ experience; (9) Cost Estimator; (cost engineering specialist(s) must be certified by a professional organization, such as Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE), International Costs Engineering Council (ICEC), and Professional Construction Estimators Association (PCEA). The firm's and/or consultant's cost engineering or estimating specialist(s), must be specifically identified and his (their) competence indicated by resume(s). If an individual will serve in more than one discipline then those disciplines shall be indicated in Block 13, PART I, Section E. Resumes (Section E of the SF 330) must be provided for all disciplines, including consultants. In the resumes under Project Assignments, use the same discipline nomenclature as is used in this announcement. The Government may provide additional consideration to offerors where key personnel worked on relevant projects that demonstrates experience relevant to Criteria B. Criteria B – Specialized Experience and Technical Competence in the type of work required, including, as appropriate, experience in Fire Protection (SF330, Part I, Section F): The offeror shall provide a combined maximum of five (5) projects in total within the past six (6) years preceding the date of this announcement for both, the prime firm and subcontractor(s) in PART I, Section F, of the SF330. Examples of projects shall not exceed two (2) pages each. If any portion of the work provided as specialized experience is subcontracted, clearly identify that work as such and provide the required experience of that subcontractor as it relates to work the subcontractor is to perform for this solicitation. If the offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Joint Venture Requirements - Parties wishing to propose as a joint venture must submit, with the Pro Forma documents, an executed copy of the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement shall be executed in accordance with FAR 4.102(d). Each joint venture partner shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer that its Board of Directors has approved its participation in the joint venture or by an instrument of similarly binding character in the case of an unincorporated entity. Offerors are reminded that to obtain an award the awardee, to include a joint venture, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database. Applicable to set aside solicitations: Joint Ventures must meet applicable size standards (See FAR Subpart 19.1). Submit with the proposal any size determination for the Joint Venture entity received from the Small Business Administration. A Joint Venture where-in one party is not a small business may be referred to the Small Business Administration (IAW FAR 19.302 (b)) to determine eligibility. All questions regarding Joint Ventures must be directed to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and not the Contracting Officer. A Project is defined as a single, stand-alone contract and/or a single task order issued under an existing IDIQ contract(s) unless the project included multiple phases and was issued under more than one contractual order. It shall be noted that an IDIQ contract is not a project. Do not combine multiple task orders unrelated to a stand-alone project to create a single project example. Combining multiple task orders under an IDIQ to create a single project will not be compliant with the solicitation criteria, and it will not be evaluated or considered. The contract number or IDIQ number and individual task order number associated with the project in the title must be included for each of the projects. If the project is not 100% complete, note the current percentage and estimated date when the project will be completed for each contract and/or task order. Firms shall only submit projects as evidence of experience if those projects are at a minimum beyond B1/65% design submission for Type A/B experience, and at a minimum 50% complete on construction for Type C experience. Include the percentage of work self-performed by the prime for each contract and/or task order. If proposing as a JV, describe the percentage of work self-performed by each Joint Venture member. The offeror and/or subcontractors must demonstrate experience in the following areas with narrative and by average revenue in part II where indicated: (1) Experience in the design of military fire suppression, fire alarm or Hangar Foam Fire Suppression projects (Profile Code M05 in Part II), including the production of programming documents, plans, calculations and specifications. (2) Design of government and commercial (Profile Code F03 in Part II) fire suppression, fire alarm or Hangar Foam Fire Suppression projects. (3) Specialized Expertise demonstrating a broad base of knowledge integrating federal requirements, as well as Technical Competence & Experience using DOD UFC and associated Unified Facilities Guide Specifications to include: Fire Protection System design, and acceptance testing experience per UFC 3-600-01, Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities; UFC 4-211-01 Aircraft Maintenance Hangars; UFC 4-211-02 Aircraft Corrosion Control and Paint Facilities; UFC 4-021-01; NPFA 409 Standard on Aircraft Hangars; NFPA 11 Standard for Low-, Medium-, and High-Expansion Foam; NFPA 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems; NFPA 20 Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection; NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code; note that the Government may provide additional consideration for engineers and architects who have received manufacturer certification in foam system design; Design and construction experience conforming to Department of Defense Antiterrorism/Force Protection Construction Standards and DOD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 4?010?01); Performance of surveying and mapping (Profile Code S10 in Part II) following A/E/C CADD Standards and nondestructive techniques for locating underground utilities; and experience with REVIT (cloud), Civil-3D or other building modeling technologies or virtual reality and UFC 3-101-01; (4) Demonstrate experience using project and construction management tools such as Newforma, Primavera, Submittal Exchange, ProjectWise, iPDWeb, or similar systems; (5) Demonstrate experience (Profile Code C15 and T02 in Part II) in evaluating contractor's submittals, request for change, request for information, and performing construction surveillance; (6) Demonstrate experience with preparing the technical portions of a Design-Build Request for Proposal package (Profile Code D04 in Part II) for performance-based design-build; Discuss techniques used to address coordination of in-progress work with design and how safety is incorporated into your documents. (7) Demonstrate experience (Profile Codes A10, E13 in Part II) in survey, design and mitigation techniques for abatement of asbestos, lead?based paint, and the handling/disposal of other toxic and regulated substances, i.e.PFOS/PFOA; (8) In Section H of the SF 330, describe the firm's quality management plan, including quality assurance process, coordination of in?house work, coordination with consultants, and prior experience of the prime firm and significant consultants or partner firms. Demonstrate project design?to?bid performance showing final design estimate and compared it to initial awarded bid amount. Provide explanations for any variance greater than 5%. (9) Demonstrate experience and familiarity with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 77 and preparing FAA 7460 permit applications relating to construction projects and familiarity with UFC 3-260-01; (10) Demonstrated experience developing performance based design requirements and equivalencies to existing codes and standards, achieving goals through fire, smoke, and egress modeling. Criteria C ? Capacity to accomplish multiple task orders in the required time (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms must have the capacity to proceed with work and accomplish it promptly once a notice to proceed is issued and accomplish it prior to scheduled completion dates, including emergency response. Firms must demonstrate the ability to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously. The evaluation will consider the prime availability of an adequate number of key personnel, equipment, and the extent of in-house facilities versus subcontracting needs. The A-E should submit evidence in the SF330 Part I, Section H, and demonstrate branch and firm size in Part II to support its capacity to accomplish work based on the following criteria: (1) Ability to meet design schedules and accomplish the work within the required time, (2) Ability to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously: (roughly equivalent to 10-14 task orders per year) with estimated design values between $20K to $5M in a cost-effective, timely manner. (3) Demonstrate the project team proposed has the ability to manage and complete the anticipated workload as a result of a contract award from this announcement considering existing work the firm already has with other Government or private entities. (4) Demonstrate the ability to meet anticipated contract requirements if the A-E is awarded more than one contract under any of the other regions being procured by the National Guard Bureau for Vertical, Horizontal, and for Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. In your response, indicate if you intend to issue a proposal under more than one region and identify those regions. Criteria D –Past Performance (SF330, Part I, Section H): Firms must provide relevant past performance in the accomplishment of similar work. Firms must submit information for relevant contracts and subcontracts including the name, address, and telephone number of references. Relevancy is defined in the DOD guide, as it pertains to the collection and use of past performance, as information that has a logical connection with the matter under consideration and application period. Submit information for all relevant contracts and subcontracts started or completed within the past six (6) years measured from the date of this notice. The six (6) years requirement is for the portion of the professional services (i.e. design efforts). Projects must be at least B1/65% designed for Type A/B and at a minimum 50% complete on construction for Type C. Firms may include supporting information in the proposal, such as letters of commendation from clients, past performance on recent similar contracts, information on problems encountered in prior contracts, and actions taken to remedy unsatisfactory performance. Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry regarding quality, cost control, and timeliness of work will be reviewed. Past DOD experience data, available to the Government through Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), will also be evaluated. Other credible, documented information on past performance should be considered, except for adverse performance information to which the firm has not had an opportunity to respond. Criteria E – Knowledge of the locality of the project areas within the United States and Territories (SF330, Part I, Section H). All contract work is to be performed within the United States and Territories. In SF330 Part I, Section H, describe and demonstrate the team’s familiarity with design requirements applicable to National Guard locations. (1) Submit a map demonstrating locations where design work has been performed in the past by the Fire Protection Engineers on your proposed team (for this section only, there is no year recency limitation for these projects) Identify fire suppression projects by one color and high expansion foam (i.e. HEF/AFFF) projects by another color. Briefly summarize your team’s specific knowledge of fire protection local conditions encountered, approach to seismic conditions and bracing requirements, structural assumptions and concerns, and knowledge of State and local building codes and practices. (2) Describe the extent of your familiarity with the defined local area construction industry expertise and its standard practices. List construction contractors with references from within the specified region for whom you have been contracted with as the Designer of Record on a Design-Build project, or for whom you have been contracted for Type C/construction administration services by a third party. Criteria F – Secondary Criteria The following Secondary Criteria will be used as tiebreakers if necessary: 1. Volume of Past DOD Contracts awarded to the firm during the previous 12 months: Offerors shall provide the volume of work awarded by DOD agencies during the previous 12 months. The volume of work shall be demonstrated in a table format and be categorized by contract, task order, project award, completion dates, and design fee dollar amount. Work previously awarded to the firm by DOD will be reviewed to effect an equitable distribution of contracts among equally qualified firms. Data from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) may be also utilized by the Government. 2. Superior Performance Evaluations on recently completed DoD contracts. Performance with ratings of exceptional will be considered as Superior Performance Evaluations. 3. The extent to which potential contractors identify and commit to small business and to small disadvantaged business (SDB) where the NAICS Industry Subsector of the subcontracted effort is one in which use of an evaluation factor or subfactor for participation of SDB concerns is authorized (see FAR 19.201(b)), and to historically black college or university and minority institution performance as subcontractors. The extent of commitment shall comply with the requirements of FAR 52.219-8. Offerors demonstrating a greater commitment to small business participation will be evaluated more favorably under this criterion. 4. Geographic Proximity within the locations of National Guard sites: Firms based in or having branch offices within each of the 10 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regions with core disciplines (full-service) including fire protection, mechanical, civil, electrical, and structural engineers working in the same office or within a proximity of fewer than 50 miles from the states within this region will be considered as meeting the requirement for geographical proximity. CRITERIA RATINGS: Technical criteria described above (A, B, C, E, and F) will be assigned one of the following adjectival ratings: BLUE (Outstanding) - SF330 Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is low PURPLE (Good) - SF330 Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. GREEN (Acceptable) - SF330 Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and the risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. YELLOW (Marginal) - SF330 Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. RED (Unacceptable) - SF330 Proposal does not meet the requirements of the synopsis advertised on Contracting Opportunities, and thus contains one or more unacceptable deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance. The proposal is non-awardable. The following adjectival relevance and performance confidence ratings will be used to evaluate the Past Performance criteria (D): Relevance Ratings Very Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Somewhat Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Not Relevant - Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Performance Confidence Ratings Substantial Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Neutral - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. Limited Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. No Confidence - Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government does not expect that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this announcement. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (if applicable e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval. The award decision for this contract will be based, in part, on an evaluation of the key personnel and/or subcontractors the Contractor included in its proposal for the positions and/or items of subcontracted work identified in the proposal. The Contractor agrees these key personnel and/or subcontractors will be employed as described in its proposal and no substitutes will be employed without the prior written approval of the Contracting Officer or Administrative Contracting Officer. The Contractor further agrees that any proposed substitutes shall meet or exceed the qualifications of the original personnel and/or subcontractors. If the Contractor’s proposal did not name a subcontractor for an identified item of work, the Contractor will not be allowed to subcontract that item of work without prior approval of the Contracting Officer or Administrative Contracting Officer. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Indicate in Section C.11 if the prime has worked with the team members in the past six (6) years. In Block G-26, along with the name, include the firm with which the person is associated. Part II is required for each branch office of the Prime Firm and any Subcontractors that will have a key role in the proposed contract. A firm will not be considered if it’s SF330 Part I is not signed, unless the SF330 Part I is accompanied by a signed cover letter or a current (within 3 years) signed SF330 Part II. If a firm does not submit an SF330 Part II with its SF330 Part I, or have one on file, it will not be considered (FAR 36.603(b)). This is not a request for a price proposal. NOTE: To avoid a conflict of interest, any contractor proposing as a prime may not have a subcontractor who is also proposing as a prime. As required by acquisition regulations, interviews to discuss prospective contractors' qualifications for the contracts will be conducted only for those firms considered most highly qualified after submittal review by the selection board. Interviews may be in-person and will be scheduled after the final selection board has determined the most highly qualified firms. Because we do not know the number of offers that will need to be reviewed, the timeframe for scheduling is uncertain but is anticipated to be at least 45 days from the close of the submittal package due date. Small Business Firms submitting a proposal under the Small Business category are required to meet the requirements of 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Deviation 2020-O0008) (e) (1), which states “By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Contractor agrees that in performance of a contract assigned a NAICS code for, (1) Services (except construction), it will not pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count toward the prime contractor’s 50 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.” All Small Business Firms submitting a proposal under the Small Business category shall provide evidence of meeting this requirement in SF330 Section H. For all subcontractors, please provide name, CAGE Code, work to be performed by the subcontractor, small business category, and percentage of work to be subcontracted. AMENDMENTS: Any changes made will be in the form of an amendment to the notice, and will be furnished to all prospective offerors via posting to https://beta.SAM.gov. Amendments will be posted in the form of a pdf document which will show edits in the form of tracked changes. Additions will be underlined and deletions will be strikethrough. Acknowledgment of Amendments: Offerors MUST acknowledge all amendments issued to this notice in order to be considered. Acknowledgment of ALL amendments can be provided in a cover letter when submitting the proposal. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS: Answers that clarify or provide an interpretation to the notice will not be posted via amendment but rather as a response to the question on beta.SAM. Responses to questions will be posted as attachments to the notice. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Interested Architect-Engineer firms having the capabilities to perform this work are invited to submit an electronic copy of their SF330 (Architect-Engineer Qualifications) in Adobe format to the Contracting Officer, Karla M. Garcia, Karla.M.GarciaMarrero.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist, Carrie McKay, Carrie.McKay@us.af.mil via Secure File Exchange. Secure File Exchange (SAFE): The offeror must submit their SF3...