Inactive

SYNOPSIS: 1. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.1. This Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) is being procured in accordance with the Brooks Act (Public Law 92-582; 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11), as implemented in ... SYNOPSIS: 1. CONTRACT INFORMATION 1.1. This Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) is being procured in accordance with the Brooks Act (Public Law 92-582; 40 U.S.C. Chapter 11), as implemented in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 36.6, for Architect-Engineer (A-E) services, to be performed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Far East District (FED) throughout the Korean Peninsula. This is an unrestricted Brooks Act acquisition open to A-E firms of all sizes. In accordance with the provisions of the U.S.-Republic of Korea (ROK) Status of Forces Agreement, only U.S. A-E firms that have their legal seats in the United States, or Korean firms that have their legal seats in the Republic of Korea, will be allowed to participate in this solicitation. A-E firms will be selected for negotiation based on demonstrated competence and qualifications for the required work, as stated herein. 1.2. The aggregate capacity for this procurement is two hundred million U.S. dollars ($200,000,000). The Government intends to award a target of five (5) Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDCs) with a shared capacity of $200,000,000 and an ordering period of one 24-month base period and three 12-month option periods, for a possible total of five years. Awards are expected to be made by approximately November 2021. 1.3. The IDCs will require the Government to order services priced at not less than $2,500 (“minimum guarantee amount”), applicable to the base period only, the funds for which will be obligated at the time of award of the basic IDCs. The minimum guarantee amount will be applied to the first task order issued under the contract that exceeds $2,500. Contractors will not be obligated to accept individual task orders valued over $10,000,000. 1.4. The primary North American Industry Classification (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541330 Engineering Services. 1.5. To be eligible for contract award, a firm must be registered in the Department of Defense (DoD) System for Award Management (SAM). Register via the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov or by contacting the Service Desk at 1 -866-606-8220. Firms must register prior to the due date for response to this synopsis in order to enable the Contracting Officer's review of SAM exclusions. 1.6. The awarded IDCs will require that the wages and benefits of applicable service employees be at least equal to those determined by the Department of Labor under the provisions of the Service Contract Labor Standards (41 U.S.C. chapter 67, formerly known as the Service Contract Act of 1965), the applicable provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.), and related Secretary of Labor regulations and instructions (29 CFR parts 4, 6, 8, and 1925), as determined relative to the employee's office location, not the location of the work. See FAR 22.10 and http://www.wdol.gov for additional information. 2. SELECTION FOR IDC NEGOTIATION AND AWARD 2.1. In accordance with the Brooks Act, applicable provisions of the Competition in Contracting Act (Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 1175), applicable provisions of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3243), and FAR 16.500(d), FED will select A-E firms for IDC negotiation using the procedures set forth in FAR Subpart 36.6 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 236.6. 2.2. FED will review and evaluate the Standard Form (SF) 330s submitted in response to this synopsis; hold discussions with the most highly qualified firms regarding concepts and the relative utility of alternative methods of furnishing the required services described in this synopsis; and on the basis of the above, determine the firms most highly qualified to perform the required services described in this synopsis; in accordance with FAR 36.602-3(a) through (d), DFARS 236.602-1(a) and DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI) 236.602-1. These procedures are set forth in greater detail in this synopsis. 3. SELECTION FOR TASK ORDER NEGOTIATION 3.1. In accordance with applicable provisions of the Brooks Act, the Competition in Contracting Act, the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, and FAR 16.500(d), FED will select firms for task order negotiation using the procedures set forth in FAR Subpart 36.6, DFARS Subpart 236.6, and DFARS PGI 236.602-1. 3.2. The Contracting Officer will ensure fair opportunity is given to all IDC holders by notifying all IDC holders of new task order requirements through a Task Order Requirements Notice (TORN). a. The TORN will include a description of the work requirements and seek interest from the IDC holders. In some cases, and consistent with USACE policies and procedures, the selecting official may request additional information from the IDC holders specific to the task order that may not be apparent on the Standard Form (SF) 330 that is on file. b. In most cases, the information provided in response to a TORN will be fairly brief, requiring minimal effort to prepare on the IDC holder’s part. c. The TORN will also include questions to each IDC holder concerning its concepts and methods for furnishing the requested services as required by FAR 36.602-3(c). d. Using the selection criteria specified in the TORN, FED will evaluate the Standard Form (SF) 330s on file and responses to the TORN to determine a minimum of three most highly qualified firms for negotiation of the task order. 4. PROJECT INFORMATION 4.1. Typical requirements for A-E services to be provided include architectural and engineering designs of new facilities (buildings, structures, utilities, systems), through all design phases, from pre-concept/parametric, to concept level, to final 100% design; major/complex repair and renovation of existing facilities; engineering studies; construction phase services; preparation of DD Form 1391s; planning and design charrettes; Building Information Modelling (BIM); landscape architecture/design; site investigations; and other general engineering activities. Other types of A?E services may include environmental studies; pipeline assessments; real estate and utility master planning; hydrology and hydraulics; geotechnical surveys and subsurface exploration. Task orders requiring geotechnical surveys and subsurface exploration are expected to be limited, as these requirements are normally executed through FED’s in-house workforce or existing service contracts. 4.2. The scope of required A-E services covers the area of responsibility (AOR) of United State Forces Korea (USFK), Foreign Military Sales, United States Department of State, and DoD facilities within the Republic of Korea (ROK). Representative types of facilities that may be the subject of design or planning services include training and operations structures; administrative buildings; military housing such as unaccompanied enlisted barracks and dormitories, officers’ quarters, and accompanied/family housing; food service such as military dining facilities and commercial restaurants; healthcare facilities such as hospitals, medical clinics, dental clinics, and veterinary clinics; communications facilities; fuel storage and dispensing facilities; religious facilities (chapels) and other family services (schools, libraries, child/youth centers); recreational and athletic facilities such as gymnasiums and multiple-purpose sports fields; airfield structures and pavements; and utility systems such as communications, power, water, gas, and sewers. Design of blast hardening; Collective Protection Systems (CPS); and Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) protection may be required for some facilities. Designs may be required to comply with Sustainable Design/Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Energy Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 13201 et seq.) Design deliverables will be required to address local construction methods in the ROK and may include approved local materials that meet the intent of U.S. standards and code criteria in order to facilitate their use. All design documents will be required to be based on metric system units. Designs and prepared drawings will be required to be accomplished using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and BIM, and comply with the current A/E/C CAD standards available from the CAD/BIM Technology Center, USACE Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC). (A/E/C stands for architect/engineer/contractor.) 4.3. Funding sources for projects undertaken by the IDC holders will include U.S. Military Construction (MILCON); Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization (SRM); Host Nation-Funded Construction programs (specifically ROK-Funded Construction (ROKFC) Cash or In-Kind); Foreign Military Sales; among others. SRM projects include maintenance, repair and minor construction projects, and will be mainly funded with Operation and Maintenance (O&M) appropriations given to the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Department of Defense. 4.4. All technical aspects of design work will be required to comply with current technical criteria that include U.S. national codes and regulations, the Unified Facilities Criteria, FED Guide Specifications and DoD Criteria and Standards. Since local materials that meet U.S. standards and criteria will used extensively, the designer will need to have knowledge of local materials and construction methods necessary to prepare accurate ROK Ministry of National Defense (MND) Bill of Material (BOM) format cost estimates in Korean language (Hangul) using MND-approved Estimate Management System (EMS) software by KoreaSoft ©. With some exceptions, construction contractors using the A-E’s designs will be Korean firms for whom English is not their native language, and their contracts may be awarded by either FED or Host Nation agencies. Construction contracts awarded by the Host Nation Agencies will require some parts of design plans to be prepared in both English and Hangul, for which the A-E contractor must have bilingual capabilities. U.S. format cost estimates will be prepared using Micro-Computer Aided Cost Estimating System (MCACES) Second Generation (MII). MND format cost estimates will be prepared using EMS software at certain phases of ROKFC In-Kind projects. The details of these requirements will be included in each task order Statement of Work issued with the task order Request for Proposal (RFP) to the most highly qualified A-E firm. 5. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following selection criteria for selection of IDC holders are listed in descending order of importance. Criteria (a) through (e) are primary. Criteria (f) and (g) are secondary and will only be used as tie-breakers among firms ranked technically equal. In accordance with the U.S.- ROK Status of Forces Agreement, only U.S. A-E firms that have their legal seats in the United States or Korean A-E firms that have their legal seats in the ROK will be selected. (a) Specialized Experience and Technical Competence. Element (1): Performance of design services of the type listed in paragraph 4, PROJECT INFORMATION. Applying DoD Design Criteria in foreign locations. Conducting and facilitating design and planning charrettes to identify functional issues, achieving consensus on project requirements, developing facility and site layouts, developing schematic preliminary designs, and developing a concept design to a 100% design. Performing designs to include foreign locations which utilize local materials and local construction methods. BOM based cost estimates and construction contract award methods. Consideration of Specialized Experience and Technical competencies for Criterion (a) will not be limited to Korea locations. SF 330 Requirements for elements (a)(1): Using SF 330 Part I, Section F, EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR THIS CONTRACT, submit ten example projects that demonstrate the A-E offeror’s and proposed subcontractors’ or subconsultants’ relevant specialized experience and technical competence. Example projects submitted must have been completed within the past 10 years. FED may consider more recent projects to be more relevant. Prepare a separate Section F for each project, identifying the contracting entity with which the A-E offeror’s firm had a contract, including the contract number. For each project, describe the project’s relevancy to the contract and each team member’s name, its location, and role. Projects for which the A-E offeror, or one of the proposed subcontractors or consultants was the prime contractor, and projects on which the A-E offeror and one or more of the proposed subcontractors or consultants have worked together may be more highly rated. Demonstrate familiarity with BOM based cost estimates and construction contract award methods with example projects of Section F and/or additional information how this capability will be acquired. For information not covered in Section F, provide additional information pertaining to elements (1) in SF 330 Part I, Section H, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. The offeror may include additional project examples in Section H to supplement information provided in Section F. Element (2): Design quality management plans. Preparation and implementing the plans with staffs located in widely dispersed geographic locations, including foreign countries, where travel restrictions may be imposed due to health pandemic conditions, to include: organizational structure related to design quality management; management approach; coordination among multiple disciplines and subcontractors or consultants; and quality control procedures including safety. The firm’s understanding of design quality control plans, review checklists, peer reviews, interdisciplinary coordination, and independent technical review procedures that will be used with each task order. Detailed Project Quality Control Plan will not be submitted in response to this synopsis. The A-E offeror’s proposed local representation, including utilization of local Korean firms, that would enable it to timely and rapidly respond to project requirements, if needed, under unusual circumstances and potential travel restrictions. SF 330 Requirements for elements (a)(2): Using SF 330 Part I, Section C, PROPOSED TEAM; Section D, ORGANIZATION CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM; and Section H, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, provide firm’s organizational chart of the proposed team showing all involved parties and description of each team member’s location, roles, and the extent of participation to ensure design quality and timely completion of projects. In SF 330 Part I, Section H, discuss significant information of the firm’s project-specific quality control plans, review checklists, peer reviews, interdisciplinary coordination, and independent technical review procedures that will be used with each task order. Detailed Project Quality Control Plan are not be submitted in response to this synopsis. (b) Professional Qualifications of Key and Specialized Personnel. Element (1): Key Personnel: Provide a minimum of two resumes for each key personnel category below only. Project management Architecture Civil engineering Cost engineering Electrical engineering Fire protection engineering Mechanical engineering Structural engineering The proposed primary lead project manager, architect, or engineer in each discipline must be registered, licensed, or certified in a United States state or territory and possess a professional license to practice in the appropriate professional field for which he/she is offered. A Project Management Professional (PMP) certificate can substitute for a professional license for a project manager. Cost engineers will be evaluated on their relevant experience. Identified key personnel may be more highly evaluated if the person(s) participated as a member of the A-E firm or a significant subconsultant in the example projects submitted in SF 330 Section F. Years of experience (total and with the current firm), education level, registration of key personnel other than the primary lead personnel, other professional qualifications, and relevant projects experiences will be considered. Element (2): Specialized Personnel: Provide a resume for one person identified against each discipline below. U.S. Registered Communication Distribution Designer (RCDD) accredited by the Building Industry Consulting Service International (BICSI) and possessing a current active RCCD registration. BIM / Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) manager. LEED Building Design and Construction (LEED BD+C) Accredited Professional (AP). Building commissioning specialist if not covered by key personnel above. (Certification as a Certified Commissioning Authority (CxA) from either Associated Air Balance Council (AABC), Association of Energy Engineers (AEE), Building Commissioning Association (BCxA), National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB), Testing, Adjusting and Balancing Bureau (TABB), American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), or University of Wisconsin-Madison.) SF 330 Requirements for Elements (b)(1) and (b)(2). Using SF 330 Section E, RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT, submit resumes of key and specialized personnel. Prepare a separate Section E for each person. Do not generalize professional registrations or certifications, rather provide specific details. Indicate whether the key personnel are employed by the prime contractor or subcontractor. (c) Past Performance. Past performance with respect to quality of work, compliance with performance schedules, and effectiveness of management for DoD contracts or contracts with other owners. At a minimum, past performance data for projects presented under Part I, Section F of the SF 330 will be evaluated. The Government will use as its primary source of information on past performance evaluations retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) as managed by the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Other sources and types of past performance, if applicable may be considered. Performance evaluations for any proposed subcontractors or consultants may also be evaluated. SF 330 Requirements for Criterion (c): Provide past performance information for the ten example projects listed in Part I, Section F; listed in response to Selection Criterion (a). For U.S. Federal Government contracts, state the contract number. Submit a copy of the final Contractor Performance Assessment Review System (CPARS) report for each U.S. Federal Government contract, if it exists. Beyond the requirement to provide final CPARS reports, where applicable, any credible, documented information on past performance may be submitted. The NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) may be submitted to provide or supplement other past performance information. The A-E offerors may obtain a PPQ standard form by submitting a request via e-mail to the FED points of contact listed below in paragraph 7.2. CPARS and PPQ information will not be counted toward the A-E offeror’s maximum page limit (see paragraph 7.5) (d) Capacity. Capacity of the firm to accomplish work in the required time. A-E firms must demonstrate they possess sufficient staffing, organization, proposed subconsultants, financial resources and technical capabilities to timely complete large and multiple concurrent task orders issued under the description of possible work requirements in paragraph 4. SF 330 Requirement for Criterion (d): Submit a narrative statement demonstrating the A-E offeror’s experience and resources to perform large and multiple task orders concurrently. Include the statement in the SF 330 Part I, Section H. Describe: (1) Past efforts in which the offeror has performed multiple projects for a particular customer within a 12 month period; (2) The resources to which the A-E offeror has access that would enable it to manage a surge in workload involving numerous large-scale task orders being awarded concurrently which may need to be completed simultaneously or within compressed performance periods and which may involve resources beyond the office assigned to the A-E offeror’s awarded IDC; (3) How the A-E offeror will manage resources in order to timely complete task order requirements for unforeseen situations that may create travel restrictions to project sites such as during health pandemic conditions. (e) Knowledge of the Locality. Ability to prepare designs that account for local conditions in foreign areas (including, but not limited to local geological features and climatic conditions), standards and application of international, United States and/or DoD design criteria in foreign locations; local construction methods and pricing, and construction market conditions. SF 330 Requirement for Criterion (e): Submit a two-page narrative statement in response to Criterion (e). Include the statement in SF 330 Part I, Section H. (f) Small Business (SB) and Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) Participation. The A-E offeror’s historical and proposed approach to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDVB), historically black colleges and universities (HBCU), and minority institutions (MI) utilization. The extent of proposed participation of SB, SDB, HBCU, or MI, measured as a percentage of the total anticipated contract effort, regardless of whether the SB, SDB, HBCU, or MI is a prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture partner. Proposals that demonstrate greater SB, SDB, HBCU, or MI participation may be more highly rated for this criterion. SF 330 Requirement for Criterion (f): Submit a two-page narrative statement in response to Criterion (f). Include the statement in the SF 330 Part I, Section H. (g) Volume of recent DoD contract awards. The total volume of new work awarded to the firm by all DoD agencies within the 12 months prior to the date of this announcement. SF 330 Requirement for Criterion (g): Identify the total value of all new, stand-alone contracts and IDC task orders, as modified, issued by DoD agencies within the 12 months prior to the date of this announcement. Do not include the ordering limit value of an IDC, nor contract or task order options which have not been exercised. Present the information in a one-page, narrative statement entitled “Volume of DoD Work” in the SF 330 Part I, Section H. 6. ON/OFF RAMP 6.1. Off Ramp Each Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) holder is expected to successfully perform the terms of their subsequent task orders, and to promptly improve performance when it does not meet the terms of the orders. If an IDC holder fails to meet these expectations, it is the Government’s intent to “off-ramp” the Contractor by: a. Permitting such Contractor’s IDC to expire instead of exercising the Option; or b. Implementing a termination for convenience (if applicable and only if such action is in the Government’s best interest); or c. Implementing a termination for default, if applicable; or d. Taking any other action which may be permitted under the Contractor’s IDC terms and conditions. 6.2. On Ramp Consistent with FAR 16.504(c) (1) (ii) (A), the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) has determined that it is in the Government’s best interest that at all times during the term of the basic contract, there remain an adequate number of IDC holders eligible to compete for Orders. Over time, the total number of IDC holders may fluctuate due to various reasons including industry consolidation, significant changes in the marketplace or advances in technology, general economic conditions, the Government's exercise of the off-ramp process, or other reasons. Recognizing this, FED intends to periodically review the total number of IDC holders participating and determine whether it would be in the Government’s best interest to initiate an open season to add new contractors to the MATOC. 6.3. Open Season Procedures If FED determines that it would be in the Government’s best interest to open a new solicitation to add new contractors to the IDC, the PCO may do so at any time provided that: a. The solicitation is issued under then-applicable federal procurement law; b. The solicitation identifies the total approximate number of new awards that the PCO intends to make. Volume 1 of the solicitation will mirror the original Volume 1 of the solicitation with the only exception(s) being incorporation of any amendments issued to the original solicitation and any changes to clauses from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses or any supplements to the FAR. The potential offerors shall be required to meet the same minimum evaluation criteria established in the original IDC solicitation for each evaluation factor where minimum criteria was established. The evaluation and selection of awardees will be on the same basis as the evaluation and award criteria used for the original IDC award. However, On Ramping offerors will not be evaluated against existing IDC holders. Existing IDC holders may not hold more than one contract under the MATOC at any time; c. The On Ramp solicitation will identify the total anticipated number of new contracts intended to be awarded in response to the On Ramp solicitation notice. d. The determination to announce a new On Ramp competition may be made on an annual or biannual basis, as determined by the PCO. The contract ordering period for any IDC holder selected in accordance with the solicitation’s On Ramp procedures will run concurrent with the existing IDC ordering period. The terms and conditions of any resulting awards will be materially identical to the terms and conditions of the existing IDC holders. e. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to not exercise remaining IDC option periods for IDC awardees if it is determined the contractor has not consistently participated in the TORN process or if performance under orders issued under the IDC have not been satisfactory. If a contractor does not consistently participate in TORNs for reasons other than bonding and/or maximum ordering limitations (MOL), then (a) the contractor acknowledges that abstaining from participation may be reflected on any contract performance evaluation, and (b) the base IDC Contracting Officer may determine that it is in the best interest of the Government to terminate the contract or not exercise any remaining IDC option periods. f. Immediately upon on-ramping award, each selected contractor is eligible to submit a proposal in response to any task order solicitation and will be eligible to receive task order awards with the same rights and obligations as any other contractor in the MATOC pool. g. The award of any new IDC does not increase the overall ceiling of the IDCs. 7. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 7.1. Interested firms seeking qualification under this announcement must submit a SF 330 Part I and Part II electronically via DoD Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) utilizing the following URL: https://safe.apps.mil/. Using the provided URL of DoD SAFE, A-E offerors will be allowed access to the DoD SAFE for uploading their qualifications proposals. A-E offerors must ensure that their documents are uploaded prior to the proposal closing date. Qualifications proposals submitted by any other means will be rejected. 7.2. In order to submit qualifications proposals via DoD SAFE, interested parties must request a drop-off token from the following officials not sooner than 14 days prior to the closing date: Brady Hales, Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), at: Brady.l.hales@usace.army.mil Hye-kyong Chon, Contract Specialist, at: Hye-kyong.chon@usace.army.mil 7.3. Size Limitations on Uploads: Being able to upload files larger than 2 gigabytes (GB) depends on the browser being used. If at all possible, use a modern 64-bit browser on a 64-bit operating system. If you only have a 32-bit system (the most common example is Windows 7), then use a modern version of Google Chrome or Firefox. Older versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer are particularly bad at this. If updating your browser is not an option and the combined size of all files being uploaded exceeds 2 GB, split the files into multiple drop-offs. If a single file exceeds 2 GB, split the file into smaller pieces (e.g. using the Split option in WinZip or "Split to volumes" option in 7-Zip) and upload them in separate drop-offs. The DoD SAFE software itself has configurable limits on the amount of data that that can be uploaded in a single drop-off. Even for browsers that support uploads larger than 2 GB, drop-off may not exceed 8.0 GB per file, or 8.0 GB total for the entire drop-off. 7.4. The following instructions shall be used to submit your proposal in SAFE. a. Personal Information: 1. Name – enter the name of the person signing the SF 330 2. Email address – enter the email address of the person responsible at the company for tracking the SAFE submission b. File Information: 1. File name – Enter in the text field: SOLICITATION NUMBER- COMPANY NAME-Part I 2. Description of Files(s) – Enter in the text field: SOLICITATION NUMBER, OFFERORS COMPANY NAME c. Recipient Information- Include the email addresses of the FED officials listed above in paragraph 7.2. d. Submission due date: The suspense for the SF 330 submission is no later than 4 April 2021 11:59 PM Eastern Daylight Time. 7.5. Page Limitation. The SF 330 Part I and Part II shall not exceed 100 pages. For submissions that exceed one hundred (100) pages, only the first one hundred (100) pages may be considered for evaluation and the extra pages will be ignored. CPARS, PPQ, and past performance information will not be counted toward the maximum page limit. SF330. If a proposal were to be printed on paper, each side of a sheet of paper will be counted as a page, except for pages on which no text appears. Size pages to be 8.5”x11” if printed; however, pages sized as 11”x17” may be used for graphics and charts. Use no smaller than 12-point font size, except 10-point font size may be used for tables, charts and graphics. 7.6 Additional guidance for preparation of qualifications proposals. a. Prepare qualifications proposals using Standard Form 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications, current revision date: 08/2016 or as specified by FAR 53.236-2(b) on the date for submission of proposals. b. Part I, CONTRACT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATIONS. For the prime A-E contractor and all proposed subcontractors or subconsultants: 1. In Section D, ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF PROPOSED TEAM, include an organizational chart to indicate how each entity of the firm (prime, joint venture (JV) partner, and each subcontractor as identified in Section C) integrates into the composite team. 2. In Section E (RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT), provide brief resumes of the firm’s key personnel that will have technical and managerial control of the contract. Resumes must be submitted for each discipline specified in paragraph 5. 3. In Section G (Key Personnel Participation In Example Projects), include in column 26 the entity (prime, JV partner, or subcontractor) and location associated with the individual. Give the names of all individuals included in the resumes provided in Section E, along with their entity, location, and role, even if example project experience in block G-28 is not applicable. 4. In Section H (ADDITIONAL INFORMATION), provide a narrative to address each of the requirements, including subparagraphs, of items listed in Section 5a, Specialized Experience and Technical Competence. When addressing the firm’s capabilities, distinguish and clarify between planned capability, existing capability and prior experience, if any. Include any other relevant information including a short discussion of why the firm is especially qualified based upon the specific criteria listed in Section 5. Indicate the estimated percentage involvement of each entity of the firm...