Inactive Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)

The HING has a requirement to establish a five (5) year BPA for Lodging for Inactive Duty (ID), Active Duty (AD), Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD), Federal Service, Yellow Ribbon Events, or when ... The HING has a requirement to establish a five (5) year BPA for Lodging for Inactive Duty (ID), Active Duty (AD), Full-Time National Guard Duty (FTNGD), Federal Service, Yellow Ribbon Events, or when other incidents requiring the use of lodging accommodations occurs. Inactive Duty (ID) is categorized of Inactive Duty Training (IDT) consisting of regularly scheduled unit training periods (regularly scheduled drills), additional IDT periods, and voluntary IDT at the following locations: 1. Oahu 2. Kauai 3. Maui 4. Hawaii Contractor must complete all Representations and Certifications found in the provisions listed below within their profile in the System for Award Management (SAM) at http://www.sam.gov. All offerors must complete provision 52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment and 52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation to be eligible for award. Quotes are due by 4:00 p.m. Hawaii Standard Time on Wednesday, 20 November, 2024. Electronic proposals must be submitted via e-mail to Emma Newbegin; emma.a.newbegin.civ@army.mil. Facsimile proposals will not be accepted. Questions regarding this solicitation may be directed to Emma Newbegin; emma.a.newbegin.civ@army.mil no later than 4:00 PM Hawaii Standard Time Tuesday, 12 November, 2024. Reference solicitation number in subject line. Submissions shall not exceed 10 pages, and provide the following: Vendor Name; Vendor POC; Vendor CAGE; Vendor DUNS; Contact Ph#; Fax and/or Email; Discount Terms (if applicable); and Socio-Economic status. Additionally, to be eligible for award, all respondents shall, with submission, provide a completed 889 Certification. The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial offer should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. (FAR 52.212-1(g)) Any offeror who is not the property owner OR which requires the Government to execute a separate agreement with a third party shall be deemed technically unacceptable.