Construction Site Security and Monitoring Services
17Sep2025 - The following questions were submitted and answered: Question 17: The PWS specifies that the SSM shall develop and implement SOPs for security positions. Will the government provide a temp... 17Sep2025 - The following questions were submitted and answered: Question 17: The PWS specifies that the SSM shall develop and implement SOPs for security positions. Will the government provide a template or standard for the SOPs and Guard Orders, or is the contractor solely responsible for developing these documents from scratch. Government Response: It is the responsibility of the SSM to develop and implement Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for all security positions i.e. CST’s, CSA’s (Government provided personnel) and to provide these documents. No additional personnel will be provided outside of the CSA’s. Although the government will not provide an SOP template, the SSM must obtain government approval for the template they develop. Question 18: The PWS states that the SSM, CST-Lead, and CST are responsible for operations "during all working hours". How will the contractor's "SSM Staff" coordinate with the Base Guard Force regarding after-hours security, and what are the specific procedures for handing over responsibility at the end of the work day? Government Response: The contractor will be responsible for securing the site at the end of the work day. Security fences and controlled areas will be secured. Base security will monitor the project site after working hours. Question 19: The PWS states that the SSM shall document all security violations or deviations from the CSP and immediately notify the AO/SSO via the Government COR. We already have a template for these reports. Will we be able to use our own, or will there be a required format. What and level of detail for these reports, what is the expected timeline for documenting the final resolution of an incident? Government Response: Contractor may utilize their template subject to government review and approval. Level of detail must be sufficient to fully document the potential incident and provide sufficient detail to fully document any and all concerns, issues, incidents and/or suspected violations as understood by the contractor at time of report. Initial report must be provided within 24 hours of initial discovery. Final resolution report must be provided within 72 hours. Question 20: The PWS also requires the SSM to maintain a roster of all workers used on the project. Will a standardized logbook format be provided by the government, or is the contractor responsible for creating and maintaining these digital logs as required by the PWS? Government Response: The contractor is responsible for creating and maintaining a softcopy and hardcopy logbook for the project duration. Logs must be available to the government at any time during the project, and must consolidated and provided to the government at project completion. Question 21: Will us as the contractor be involved in the 35%, 65%, and 95% design reviews? Or will we receive a completed set of drawings to make corrections to after the fact? Government Response: As per the PWS 3.5.1.1, the contractor will conduct comprehensive document reviews at each major design milestone (90%, Pre-final, and Final) and if required design changes occur after final approved design. Question 22: As the Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) on this project, we will provide our recommendations on the specific brands of IDS and ACS to be used. Will our input be considered during the selection process, or will the Accrediting Official (AO) be the sole authority in determining which brands are acceptable for this build? Government Response: Naval Information Warfare System Command (NIWC) designed the IDS/ESS system and they will procure and install all systems IAW ICD/ICS 705 and accreditation official’s standards. 16Sep2025 - The following questions were submitted and answered: Question 15. IAW PWS Para 3.4.1.2 Will the government please confirm that listed certifications for the SME are required to be submitted with the proposal? Government Response: Per PWS section 3.4: The list of Key Personnel with supporting documentation to show all experience and training qualifications are met will be submitted for Government approval within 10 days after award. Question 16: Also, what are the font size and page limitation requirements? Government Response: Font size should be Time New Roman no larger than 12 point font size. Submissions should be no longer than fifteen (15) pages. 13Sep2025 - The following questions were submitted and answered: Question 13. How would we be able to get a response from CTF-75 as to whether they would sponsor us for a TS FCL? Government Response: CTF-75 responded to Question #1 and indicated they will sponsor the FCL. Question 14. Should we be unable to get them to sponsor us for an FCL, our subcontractor has a TS FCL and may bid but they are awaiting the SBA to certify them as a SDVOSB. Would the Contracting Office accept a pending SDVOSB company? Government Response: No, in accordance with FAR 19.1405(a) Contracting Officers shall ensure that SDVOSB concerns are listed in the VetCert database prior to award. Furthermore, in accordance with FAR 9.104-1(g) - To determine contractor responsibility, a prospective contractor must: Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. Being a certified SDVOSB is part of being qualified and eligible for an SDVOSB set-aside. 12Sep 2025- The following questions were submitted and answered: Question 1: Would the Contracting Office be willing to sponsor us for an FCL? We were primarily subcontractors and require a TS FCL for this effort. Government Response: No, the Contracting Office will not sponsor. CTF-75 (government) will sponsor the FCL. Question 2: Would the Contracting Office consider extending the submission date? Given the complexity of this effort, only 12 days to submission is rather demanding. Government Response: No, the Contracting Office will not consider an extension. Question 3: This appears to be a rehab of an existing structure requiring a quick turnaround (six months), having only one or two CSTs on site seems very difficult to cover the workload demands being asked for. Will the Contracting Office be able to expand this CST requirement? Government Response: The base contract OnSite period of performance is only six months. Option periods may be exercised at the government’s discretion. The number of CSTs requested is set, they will be supplemented by a minimum of four government provided CSAs. Question 4: Will there be Cleared American Guards (CAGs) on site to control access to the worksite? The requirement identifies an ACF (Access Control Facility) and Sallyport which is usually manned by CAGs. Government Response: There are no CAGs required, the ACF is within the secure confines of the military installation and project security fence. Question 5: The work hours indicates around the clock operations. Given the current labor hours regulations, will there be several shifts? That would increase the badging and access demands. Government Response: The 24 hour operational requirement was deleted from the PWS and revised PWS section 7. The normal working hours are expected to be 10 hours per day and 5 days per week. The 10 hours per day will encompass the construction contractor’s 9 hours workday, with an additional 30min before and after for setup and securing. Minor variation in the construction schedule may require an intermittent change to normal working hours. Please acknowledge the SF-30 amendment due to the change in the PWS. Question 6: Will a SSA (Secure Storage Area) be established and who would control access? It is usually manned by a CST who escorts the material to the site. Government Response: The SSA is co-located at the project site and will contain several secure storage containers and be will encompassed by a locked security fence. The expectation is the CST will only man the SSA when the construction contractor requires access. Question 7: Will the secure material going into the SSA require special shipping or handling or purchased off the local economy, requiring special security procedures? Government Response: No known special shipping or handling requirement prior to material arrival on the project site. All project materials will be TAA compliant, but will need to be scanned upon arrival with X-ray machine and Non-Linear Junction Box Detector prior to entering the SSA. Question 8: Construction Surveillance Technicians are Counter-intelligence personnel (TS cleared) not Physical Security, which are performed by CAGs (Secret cleared). Their CST background is in the Trades fields. Would the SSM be able to determine if the personnel on-site or visitors are properly cleared? Government Response: Yes, the SSM would be able to determine clearance procedures and responsible for ensuring personnel and visitors are properly cleared. Question 9: The SME and SSM positions are listed as having to have advanced degrees. There is no advanced degree associated with ICD 705. Most of our experience come from actual on-site experience. Would the Contracting Office be open to replacing education requirements with actual experience? Government Response: Yes, the advanced degree requirement for the SME will be removed from the PWS section 3.4.1.2. There is no SSM advanced degree requirement. Please acknowledge the SF-30 amendment due to the change in the PWS. Question 10: There is a three-year experience requirement and unidentified training requirements for the 2 CSTs. Would the Contracting Office be willing to waive the training requirements if the CSTs already have three years of experience? Government Response: Please clarify what section of the PWS has the three-year experience requirement referred to and what specific training requirements and you requesting to have waived? Question 11: Will the people working in the secure work area be cleared? If so, to what level? Government Response: The construction personnel will be cleared through DBIDS with no additional security clearance level. The CSP mitigation is the additional oversight from multiple government provided CSAs. Question 12: Will there be outside visitors allowed into the secure space during construction? Government Response: The only anticipated visitors will be personnel from the construction contracting agency (NAVFAC) or customer (CTF-75). See government response to Question 8 for visitor clearing. Amendment 0001 Effective 12Sep 2025 The purpose of this amendment is to add Att 01 Performance Work Statement 12SEP25 This amendment serves to: 1. Provide an updated Performance Work Statement (PWS). The revised PWS Att 01 Performance Work Statement 12SEP25 replaces and supersedes the previous version in its entirety. Key changes as follows: -Removed Section 3.4.1.2.7 The SME shall have a graduate level degree (M.A., M.S., or above) from an accredited university in a security or intelligence field. -Updated Section 7. Work Hours Offerors are advised to carefully review the updated PWS. **All previously submitted quotes must be resubmitted after the posting of this amendment in order to be considered for award.** ALL AMENDMENTS MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED IN ACCORADANCE WITH BLOCK 11 OF THE SF 30 Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka (FLCY) Site Marianas has a requirement to provide Commander, Task Force 75 (CTF-75) construction security and surveillance services, onboard Naval Base Guam, to support a secure construction project in accordance with the Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705 series and Department of Defense (DoD) policies.
Data sourced from SAM.gov.
View Official Posting »