Inactive Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)

Surface Fire Fighter and Damage Control Contractor Operation and Maintenance Services (Surf FF/DC COMS) REVISION AMENDMENT 0001 12/23/2019: This revision is posted after Amendment 0001. This revision ... Surface Fire Fighter and Damage Control Contractor Operation and Maintenance Services (Surf FF/DC COMS) REVISION AMENDMENT 0001 12/23/2019: This revision is posted after Amendment 0001. This revision deletes Att (L-9B) Surf FF-DC Manpower Projection Workbook_20 Dec 2019 and replaces it in its entirety for Att (L-9B) Surf FF-DC Manpower Projection Workbook_23 Dec 2019. AMENDMENT 0001 12/20/2019: This Amendment is for the Surface Fire Fighter and Damage Control Contractor Operation and Maintenance Services (Surf FF/DC COMS), Request for Proposal N6134020R0005, and is identified as 0001. Please see document .N61340-20-R-0005 Amendment 0001 for more detailed information. No other terms and conditions have changed with this amendment except as identified herein. REVISION12/10/19: This revision has replaced in its entirety Att (9A) Sect B Price Evaluation Worksheet only. REVISION12/9/19: This revision has replaced WD ATCH 10C_WD 15-5636 (Rev.-11) San Diego in its entirety. REVISION 12/9/19: This revision has answered questions, added CBA, added W-D Equipment List, and has updated the Consumable Report. The PWS and relavant Appendices will be updated via RFP Amendment, anticipated on or before 19 Dec 2019. This ends this revision. ------------------------ Request for Proposal N6134020R0005 *Note- this effort was also previously posted as N6134019R0038 under the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) Introduction: The Department of the Navy, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD), Orlando, FL, seeks proposals to provide Contractor Operation and Maintenance Services (COMS), for the Surface Warfare Officer School (SWOS) customer. COMS requires the contractor to provide all labor, materials, consumables, equipment, tools, test equipment, and transportation necessary to maintain the training systems and equipment in a fully operational condition, and to facilitate user training. Scheduling authority resides with the Government. Trainers are at 7 (seven) Commands located at six (6) geographic locations. The government is pursuing a Firm-Fixed Price Contract (one year base, with four (4) one year options) with Cost Reimbursable lines for trainer Consumable products. Performance Locations: Work will be conducted at Mayport, FL, Norfolk, VA, Newport, RI, San Diego, CA, Pearl Harbor, HI, RTC Great Lakes, IL, and SWOSU Great Lakes, IL. Future requirements may include Yokosuka, Japan which is not priced as part of this RFP. Size Status: This is a 100% small business set-aside. The applicable NAICS code for this requirement is 541330, Engineering Services (Military and Aerospace Equipment and Military Weapons Exception), size standard of $41.5M. The Product Service Code is J069 - Maintenance, Repair, and Rebuilding of Equipment- Training Aids and Devices. If you are a small business interested in being the prime contractor for this effort, please be advised that the FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting clause has changed. Deviation 2019-O0003 is now in effect which adds the definition of “Similarly Situated Entity” and changes the 50% calculation for compliance with the clause. Small business primes may now count “first tier subcontracted” work performed by similarly situated entities as if it were performed by the prime itself. Please read the full text of the clause deviation (52.219-14 Class Deviation 2019-O0003 dated 12/3/18 at http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vmfara.htm). Submission Details: Please see Block 9 of the RFP SF 33 for proposal due date. Point of Contacts are listed in Section L of the RFP. Inclusion of the MOPAS with this RFP: The Government has posted the internal documentation for the Management and Oversight Process for the Acquisition of Services (MOPAS) for this requirement. During the RFP development phase, the MOPAS was inadvertently electronically distributed to a potential offeror. After an internal investigation, it was determined that this was not Procurement Integrity Act violation as it was in error without the intent of giving any specific potential offeror a competitive advantage. Therefore, in order to maintain the integrity of this procurement, the Government has posted this internal documentation for all potential offerors. Please note that this is not a standard practice.