Inactive

CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N713.26|HGA|(717) 605-1884|JOSEPH.D.WEAVER22.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT... CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N713.26|HGA|(717) 605-1884|JOSEPH.D.WEAVER22.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL| ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT (NAVICP REVIEW FEB 1991)(FEB 1999)|1|IS09001| INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES--FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1996)|2||| TIME OF DELIVERY (JUNE 1997)|20||||||||||||||||||||| STOP-WORK ORDER (AUG 1989)|1|| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|COMBO INVOICE & RECEIVING||TBD|N00104|TBD|TBD|SEE SCHEDULE|TBD|||TBD|||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|WSS| VALUE ENGINEERING (JUN 2020)|3|||| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (SEP 2016)|2||| INTEGRITY OF UNIT PRICES (NOV 2021)|1|| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (JUN 2020)|4||||| SAFEGUARDING SENSITIVE CONVENTIONAL ARMS, AMMUNITION, AND EXPLOSIVES (NOV 2023))|9|||||||||| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUN 2020)|2||| TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA (JAN 2023)|2||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION-BASIC (MAY 2014)|1|| LIMITATION OF LIABILITY--HIGH-VALUE ITEMS ($100K)(FEB 1997)|1|| NOTICE OF TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (OCT 2020)(DEVIATION 2020-O0008)|1|| LIST OF AWARD ATTACHMENTS|5|||||| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (NOV 2023)|13|||||||||||||| SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (FEB 2024)|4||||| BUY AMERICAN-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAY 2024)|13|333996|1250|||||||||||| INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS -- COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (NOV 2021)|2||| TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)|1|FFP| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PERPARDENESS, AND ENRGY PROGAM USE (APRIL 2008))|2||X| Amendment hereby extends the allowable proposal submission till 5 PM EST on 9/11/2024. Amendment hereby updates the Remarks for Section L&M in the initial RFP to read as such: SECTION L- SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS I.GENERAL In addition to instructions to offerors contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following instructions are provided. Proposals are to be submitted to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date/time cited elsewhere in this Request for Proposals. Proposals shall comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposals contained herein; proposals that do not comply may be considered unacceptable and may render the proposal ineligible for award. Offerors shall submit their proposals in two separate volumes via email as follows: Volume I Non-Price Proposal Volume II Price Proposal In addition, offers shall consist of and shall include the following items as part of Volume II: Solicitation cover sheet with appropriate blocks completed by the offeror. Solicitation pricing pages completed by the offeror Acknowledgement of solicitation amendments (if not previously acknowledged). Representations and Certifications completed by the offeror in accordance with instructions contained elsewhere in this solicitation. If the offeror has completed all of the representations and certifications required by this solicitation in SAM (www.sam.gov) in accordance with FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 ALT A, then the offeror should so indicate in their response. The completion and submission of the above items will constitute an offer (proposal). Offerors shall respond to all requirements of the solicitation document. Offerors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation. Alternate proposals are not authorized. An objection to any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation will constitute a deficiency (see FAR 15.001) which will make the offer unacceptable. In the event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person's employment capacity, the name of the person's firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the proposal in which the person participated. VOLUME I NON-PRICE PROPOSAL:This volume shall address Previous Experience and Technical Approach and include all information required for proposal evaluation. This volume of the proposal shall exclude any reference to the price aspects of the proposal. Each page of each copy should include the following legend: Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104. VOLUME II PRICE PROPOSAL: This volume shall include the completed solicitation documents and a complete and detailed price schedule. Each page of each copy should include the following legend: Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 II.REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT (1) Do not include CLASSIFIED data in your proposal. (2) Introduction and Purpose - This section specifies the format that offers should use in proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The intent is not to restrict the offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the proposals for evaluation purposes. (3) Each volume should contain the following items in addition to the other information required by this solicitation: Cover: The cover should indicate the following: Title of the proposal Volume Number (I or II) Solicitation number Name, address, and phone number of offeror Identification of original signature copies Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide detail sufficient to allow the important elements to be easily located. (4) Requirements for Style: Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely sets forth the contractor's response to the requirements of the solicitation. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the offeror's lack of cost consciousness. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within its proposal. III.PROPOSAL CONTENT (1) Volume I - Non-Price Proposal. The Non-Price evaluation factors are listed below in descending order of importance: -PRIOR EXPERIENCE -TECHNICAL APPROACH The Non-price evaluation factors are listed in detail below: -PRIOR EXPERIENCE: The offeror's background, experience repairing NSN: 4320012274926, and qualifications will be assessed to determine the likelihood that that offeror can successfully perform the contract requirements and the degree of the risk of non-performance.-TECHNICAL APPROACH: Sources of overhaul and repair for Navy Standard Titanium Fire Pumps (NSTFP), need to be fully proficient in theircapability to repair NSTFP's. Prior to negotiating an offer for contract award, source of repair should assess and evaluate if it has thefacility and personnel expertise, to meet the government requirements. Repair facility shall self-assess the following criteria: 1) Repair facility contains sufficient machines/tools to repair pump including machining of wear rings and impeller. 2) Access to pump drawings and overhaul procedures. 3) Access to repair parts (at facility) or, that are readily available at other facilities/sources. 4) Details on subcontractor used to repair/overhaul motor in accordance with MIL-M-17060 (when specified). Repair facility or Subcontractor must be NAVSEA certified in repairing sealed insulation systems (SIS). 5) Proficiency/History of repair or manufacturing of NSTFPs or other Mil-Spec centrifugal pumps. 6) Facility/equipment to hydrostatically test pump and perform flow/head curve test (Including/established requirements of performance testing). 7) Quality Assurance system in place including calibration of test equipment. (2) Volume II - Price Proposal Volume II shall include the completed solicitation documents and a complete and detailed price schedule. The price/cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. If the price/cost proposal does not support the Non-price proposal, the offeror's overall technical proposal rating may be downgraded. The price/cost proposal shall include all elements of cost and such other cost information as considered appropriate to support the offeror's proposal. The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror's Non-price proposal more important than the offeror's Price proposal. (a) Each offeror shall identify in its pricing proposal if the offeror intends to obtain engineering support services from the government for efforts related to this repair. NAVSUP WSS intends to identify the level of support, if any, provided to an offeror by the government in the past fiscal year and assign the appropriate monetary value associated with any engineering support provided to an offeror during that fiscal year. This value will then be added accordingly to the unit price per repair in order to ensure that each offeror's price is evaluated equally. The Government shall not be responsible for compensating the Contractor for any costs tied to solicitation requirements but not factored into the proposed prices, either by the Contractor's intention or by mistake. SECTION M- EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD (SINGLE AWARD) The Government will utilize the DoD Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) (SPRS) program to evaluate past performance(refer to DFARS provision 252.213-7000, "NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE SUPPLIERS ON USE OF SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK SYSTEM (SPRS) IN PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS"). SPRS accumulates data on suppliers by Federal Supply Class (FSC). The Government will consider SPRS data for the Federal Supply Classes of all items included in this procurement. Based on comparisons among suppliers in a specific FSC group, SPRS sorts suppliers into color ratings representing the supplier's overall quality performance based on the following indices: |COLOR |POSITION | |Dark Blue|Top 5% of suppliers in FSC group | |Purple |Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group | |Green |Next 70% of suppliers in FSC group | |Yellow |Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group | |Red |Bottom 5% of suppliers in FSC group | If all supplier ratings for a specific FSC group are equal, all suppliers within that group will be classified Green. Suppliers with no history in SPRS will be displayed without a rating and, for evaluation, receive a neutral rating. (2) Price. Price is a secondary factor. (3) The non-price factors are again listed below in descending order of importance: - PRIOR EXPERIENCE - TECHNICAL APPROACH For all non-price factors (other than Past Performance), an offeror's proposal must be determined to be Acceptable to be eligible for award. A rating that is Unacceptable in any non-price evaluation factor will render a proposal ineligible for award consideration as submitted. For the purpose of preparing a price proposal, the offeror shall assume that the ordering period shall be from 23 APR 2024 through 23 MAY 2024. The evaluated price will be the offeror's total proposed price. Any delay in award or change in the period of performance start dates in the resulting award shall not entitled the contractor to a price adjustment. BASIS FOR SELECTION: The Government will select the responsible Contractor whose proposal, in conforming to this RFP, provides the overall best value to meet the Government's requirements, price and non-price factors considered. Only the apparent successful contractor determined to be responsible pursuant to FAR 9.104-1 will be issued a contract. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that the offeror's overall firm fixed price proposal represents an unacceptable level of risk, based on the information submitted by the offeror. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. \ This RFP is for repair. The resultant award of this contract will be issued bilaterally, requiring the contractor's written acceptance prior to execution. Verify nomenclature, part number, and NSN prior to responding to the subject RFP. SECTION L L0X - SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS I.GENERAL In addition to instructions to offerors contained elsewhere in this solicitation, the following instructions are provided. Proposals are to be submitted to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date/time cited elsewhere in this Request for Proposals. Proposals shall comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposals contained herein; proposals that do not comply may be considered unacceptable and may render the proposal ineligible for award. Offerors shall submit their proposals in two separate volumes as follows: Volume I Non-Price Proposal Volume II Price Proposal In addition, offers shall consist of and shall include the following items as part of Volume II: Solicitation cover sheet with appropriate blocks completed by the offeror. Solicitation pricing pages completed by the offeror Acknowledgement of solicitation amendments pursuant to FAR 52.212-1 (if not previously acknowledged). Representations and Certifications completed by the offeror in accordance with instructions contained elsewhere in this solicitation. If the offeror has completed all of the representations and certifications required by this solicitation in SAM (www.sam.gov) in accordance with FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 ALT A, then the offeror should so indicate in their response. The completion and submission of the above items will constitute an offer (proposal). Offerors shall respond to all requirements of the solicitation document. Offerors are cautioned not to alter the solicitation. Alternate proposals are not authorized. An objection to any of the terms and conditions of the solicitation will constitute a deficiency (see FAR 15.001) which will make the offer unacceptable. In the event any person who is not a bona fide employee of the offeror participated in the creation, formulation, or writing of any portion of the proposal, a certificate to this effect shall be included in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall in the proposal which shall be signed by an officer of the offeror. Such certificate shall identify the name of the person who is not a bona fide employee, that person's employment capacity, the name of the person's firm, the relationship of that firm to the offeror, and the portion of the proposal in which the person participated. VOLUME I NON-PRICE PROPOSAL:This volume shall address Previous Experience and Technical Approach and include all information required for proposal evaluation. This volume of the proposal shall exclude any reference to the price aspects of the proposal. Each page of each copy should include the following legend: Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104. VOLUME II PRICE PROPOSAL: This volume shall include the completed solicitation documents and a complete and detailed price schedule. Each page of each copy should include the following legend: Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 II.REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPOSAL CONTENT (1) Do not include CLASSIFIED data in your proposal. (2) Introduction and Purpose - This section specifies the format that offers should use in proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. The intent is not to restrict the offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the proposals for evaluation purposes. (3) Each volume should contain the following items in addition to the other information required by this solicitation: Cover: The cover should indicate the following: Title of the proposal Volume Number (I or II) Solicitation number Name, address, and phone number of offeror Identification of original signature copies Table of Contents: The table of contents should provide detail sufficient to allow the important elements to be easily located. (4) Requirements for Style: Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely sets forth the contractor's response to the requirements of the solicitation. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired and may be construed as an indication of the offeror's lack of cost consciousness. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the one area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within its proposal. III.PROPOSAL CONTENT (1) Volume I - Non-Price Proposal. The Non-Price evaluation factors are listed below in descending order of importance: -PRIOR EXPERIENCE -TECHNICAL APPROACH The Non-price evaluation factors are listed in detail below: -PRIOR EXPERIENCE: The offeror's background, experience repairing NSN: 4320012274926, and qualifications will be assessed to determine the likelihood that that offeror can successfully perform the contract requirements and the degree of the risk of non-performance.-TECHNICAL APPROACH: Sources of overhaul and repair for Navy Standard Titanium Fire Pumps (NSTFP), need to be fully proficient in their capability to repair NSTFP's. Prior to negotiating an offer for contract award, source of repair should assess and evaluate if it has the facility and personnel expertise, to meet the government requirements. Repair facility shall self-assess the following criteria: 1) Repair facility contains sufficient machines/tools to repair pump including machining of wear rings and impeller. 2) Access to pump drawings and overhaul procedures. 3) Access to repair parts (at facility) or, that are readily available at other facilities/sources. 4) Details on subcontractor used to repair/overhaul motor in accordance with MIL-M-17060 (when specified). Repair facility or Subcontractor must be NAVSEA certified in repairing sealed insulation systems (SIS). 5) Proficiency/History of repair or manufacturing of NSTFPs or other Mil-Spec centrifugal pumps. 6) Facility/equipment to hydrostatically test pump and perform flow/head curve test (Including/established requirements of performance testing). 7) Quality Assurance system in place including calibration of test equipment. (2) Volume II - Price Proposal Volume II shall include the completed solicitation documents and a complete and detailed price schedule. The price/cost proposal shall support the Non-price proposal. If the price/cost proposal does not support the Non-price proposal, the offeror's overall technical proposal rating may be downgraded. The price/cost proposal shall include all elements of cost and such other cost information as considered appropriate to support the offeror's proposal. The evaluation of proposals will consider the offeror's Non-price proposal more important than the offeror's Price proposal. (a) Each offeror shall identify in its pricing proposal if the offeror intends to obtain engineering support services from the government for efforts related to this repair. NAVSUP WSS intends to identify the level of support, if any, provided to an offeror by the government in the past fiscal year and assign the appropriate monetary value associated with any engineering support provided to an offeror during that fiscal year. This value will then be added accordingly to the unit price per repair in order to ensure that each offeror's price is evaluated equally. The Government shall not be responsible for compensating the Contractor for any costs tied to solicitation requirements but not factored into the proposed prices, either by the Contractor's intention or by mistake. SECTION M M0X - EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD (SINGLE AWARD) The Government intends to make a single award to the eligible, responsible, technically acceptable contractor whose offer, conforms to the solicitation, is determined most advantageous to the Government. The evaluation will consider past performance as more important than price. The offeror's proposal shall be in the form prescribed by, and shall contain a response to each of the area identified in, the Section L solicitation provision entitled "Submission of Proposals." Only those proposals prepared in accordance with the solicitation will be evaluated. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced offer. (1) Past Performance. The Government will evaluate the quality of the offeror's past performance. This evaluation isseparate and distinct from the Contracting Officer's responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror's past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative capability of the offeror and other competitors to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a neutral rating for past performance. However, the proposal of an offeror with no relevant past performance history, while rated neutral in past performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government and thus, may be an unsuccessful proposal when compared to the p proposals of other offerors. The offeror must provide the information requested in the provision entitled Submission of Proposals in Section L or affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly-related or similar past performance. An offeror failing to provide the past performance information or to assert that it has no relevant directly-related or similar past performance will be considered ineligible for award. The Government will utilize the DoD Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) (SPRS) program to evaluate past performance (refer to DFARS provision 252.213-7000, "NOTICE TO PROSPECTIVE SUPPLIERS ON USE OF SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE RISK SYSTEM (SPRS) IN PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS"). SPRS accumulates data on suppliers by Federal Supply Class (FSC). The Government will consider SPRS data for the Federal Supply Classes of all items included in this procurement. Based on comparisons among suppliers in a specific FSC group, SPRS sorts suppliers into color ratings representing the supplier's overall quality performance based on the following indices: |COLOR |POSITION | |Dark Blue|Top 5% of suppliers in FSC group | |Purple |Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group | |Green |Next 70% of suppliers in FSC group | |Yellow |Next 10% of suppliers in FSC group | |Red |Bottom 5% of suppliers in FSC group | If all supplier ratings for a specific FSC group are equal, all suppliers within that group will be classified Green. Suppliers with no history in SPRS will be displayed without a rating and, for evaluation, receive a neutral rating. (2) Price. Price is a secondary factor. (3) The non-price factors are again listed below in descending order of importance: - PRIOR EXPERIENCE - TECHNICAL APPROACH For all non-price factors (other than Past Performance), an offeror's proposal must be determined to be Acceptable to be eligible for award. A rating that is Unacceptable in any non-price evaluation factor will render a proposal ineligible for award consideration as submitted. For the purpose of preparing a price proposal, the offeror shall assume that the ordering period shall be from 23 APR 2024 through 23 MAY 2024. The evaluated price will be the offeror's total proposed price. Any delay in award or change in the period of performance start dates in the resulting award shall not entitled the contractor to a price adjustment. BASIS FOR SELECTION: The Government will select the responsible Contractor whose proposal, in conforming to this RFP, provides the overall best value to meet the Government's requirements, price and non-price factors considered. Only the apparent successful contractor determined to be responsible pursuant to FAR 9.104-1 will be issued a contract. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and non-price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later it is determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to determine that the offeror's overall firm fixed price proposal represents an unacceptable level of risk, based on the information submitted by the offeror. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award. Accelerated delivery is encouraged and accepted before the delivery date(s) listed in the schedule. All freight is FOB origin. This RFP is for repair. The resultant award of this contract will be issued bilaterally, requiring the contractor's written acceptance prior to execution. Verify nomenclature, part number, and NSN prior to responding. Required Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) 229 days. Government source inspection and final acceptance is required prior to shipment of assets to destination. Please note: freight is handled by NavyCAV or ProxyCAV as stated in clause NAVSUPWSSFA24 or NAVSUPWSSFA25 Facility/Subcontractor CAGE (where the asset should be shipped), if not at source_________ Your proposal should include the following information: Unit Price:____________ FIRM Inspection & Acceptance CAGE, if not at source:____________ Facility/subcontractor CAGE (where the asset should be shipped), if not at source_________ POC:J.WEAVER (N713.26) Email:joseph.d.weaver22.civ@us.navy.mil \ 1. SCOPE 1.1 This contract/purchase order contains the requirements for repair and the contract quality requirements for the PUMP,CENTRIFUGAL . 2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 Applicable Documents - The document(s) listed below form a part of this contract/purchase order including modifications or exclusions. 2.1.1 "Document References" listed below must be obtained by the Contractor. Ordering information is included as an attachment to this contract/purchase order. DRAWING DATA=5773203 |53711| G| |A|0001 | G|49998|9999999 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Cage Code/Reference Number Items - The PUMP,CENTRIFUGAL repaired under this contract/purchase order shall meet the operational and functional requirements as represented by the Cage Code(s) and reference number(s) listed below. All repair work shall be performed in accordance with the contractors repair/overhaul standard practices, manuals and directives including but not limited to drawings, technical orders, manufacturing operations, tooling instructions, approved repair standards and any other contractor or government approved documents developed to provide technical repair procedures. CAGE___Ref. No. ;53711 5773203-25 ; 3.2 Marking - This item shall be physically identified in accordance with ;MIL-STD-130, REV N, 16 NOV 2012; . 3.3 Changes in Design, Material Servicing, or Part Number - Except for a Code 1 change, which shall be processed as provided in the code statement shown below, no substitution of items shall be made until the NAVICP-MECH Contracting Officer has notified and approval has been given by issuance of a written change order. When any change in design, material, servicing or part number is made to replace or substitute any item to be furnished on this contract/purchase order, the Contractor shall furnish, for the substituting/replacement item, a drawing and an explanation of the reason for the change, explaining the reason therefor. If finished detail drawings are not available, shop drawings in the form used by the manufacturer will be acceptable for Government evaluation. When notifying the Procurement Contracting Officer of the reasons for making substitutions, the type of change shall be indicated by code number in accordance with one of the following statements: Code 1: PART NUMBER CHANGE ONLY - If the Manufacturer's Part Number indicated thereon has changed, but the parts are identical in all respects, supply the item and advise NAVICP-MECH immediately of the new part number. Code 2: Assembly (or set or kit) not furnished - Used following detail parts. Code 3: Part not furnished separately - Use assembly. Code 4: Part redesigned - Old and new parts are completely interchangeable. Code 5: Part redesigned - New part replaces old. Old part cannot replace new. Code 6: Part redesigned - Parts not interchangeable. 3.4 ;Sources of overhaul and repair for Navy Standard Titanium Fire Pumps (NSTFP), need to be fully proficient in their capability to repair NSTFP's. Prior to negotiating an offer for contract award, source of repair should assess and evaluate if it has the facility and personnel expertise, to meet the government requirements. Repair facility shall self-assess the following criteria: 1. Repair facility contains sufficient machines/tools to repair pump including machining of wear rings and impeller. 2. Access to pump drawings and overhaul procedures. 3. Access to repair parts (at facility) or, that are readily available at other facilities/sources. 4. Details on subcontractor used to repair/overhaul motor in accordance with MIL-M-17060 (when specified). Repair facility or Subcontractor must be NAVSEA certified in repairing sealed insulation systems (SIS). 5. Proficiency/History of repair or manufacturing of NSTFPs or other Mil-Spec centrifugal pumps. 6. Facility/equipment to hydrostatically test pump and perform flow/head curve test (Including/established requirements of performance testing). 7. Quality Assurance system in place including calibration of test equipment.; 4. QUALITY ASSURANCE 4.1 Responsibility for Inspection - Unless otherwise specified in the contract/purchase order, the Contractor is responsible for the performance of all inspection requirements as specified herein. Except as otherwise specified in the contract/purchase order, the Contractor may use his own or any other facilities suitable for the performance of the inspection requirements specified herein, unless disapproved by the Governmen...

Inactive Total Small Business Set-Aside (FAR 19.5)

NSN 7H-4320-012274926-QA, TDP VER 013, QTY 13 EA, DELIVER TO W25G1U, W1A8 DLA DISTRIBUTION, NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5002, INDUCTION NIIN IS 7H, 4320, 012274926, QA, PUMP,CENTRIFUGAL, 5773203-25QA. Th... NSN 7H-4320-012274926-QA, TDP VER 013, QTY 13 EA, DELIVER TO W25G1U, W1A8 DLA DISTRIBUTION, NEW CUMBERLAND, PA 17070-5002, INDUCTION NIIN IS 7H, 4320, 012274926, QA, PUMP,CENTRIFUGAL, 5773203-25QA. The Government has rights to the technical data, the data package is complete, and there are no technical data, engineering, tooling or manufacturing restrictions. (This is the only A/RMSC that implies that parts are candidates for full and open competition. Other A/RMSCs such as K, M, N, Q, and S may imply limited competition when two or more independent sources exist yet the technical data package is inadequate for full and open competition.) A/RMCs 1 or 2 are valid. The proposed acquisition is 100% set aside for small business concerns (see FAR clause 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside). The specific type of set-aside will be addressed in the solicitation through inclusion of one of the appropriate clauses listed here: FAR 52.219-3 Notice of HUBZone Set-Aside or Sole Source Award FAR 52.219-27 Notice of Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Set-Aside FAR 52.219-29 Notice of Set-Aside for Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business Concerns FAR 52.219-30 Notice of Set-Aside for Women-Owned Small Business Concerns Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program DFARS 252.226-7000 Notice of Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Set-Aside Based upon market research, the Government is not using the policies contained in FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items, in its solicitation for the described supplies or services. However, interested persons may identify to the contracting officer their interest and capability to satisfy the Government's requirement with a commercial item within 15 days of this notice.